| 03/11/2020 |
| At the direction of the Court, it is
ORDERED that the Court's order entered on February 4, 2020, scheduling oral argument for Thursday, March 26, 2020, at 12:45 p.m. in Room 118 (Auditorium), at Penn State Law School located in University Park, Pennsylvania is revoked.
It is further ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, that oral argument is rescheduled for Thursday, March 26, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom at Suite 900, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. Counsel for the parties are allotted 30 minutes each for presentation of argument. (GOB) (DB) |
| 03/13/2020 |
| ORDERED that the Court's order entered on March 11, 2020, rescheduling oral argument for Thursday, March 26, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. is revoked.
Due to health-related concerns associated with the spread of the COVID-19 virus, oral argument in this case is now canceled, subject to rescheduling in the future as the business of the Court permits. Questions from the parties regarding rescheduling or alternative arrangements should be directed to the Clerk of the Court (gblock@uscourts.cavc.gov). (GOB)--[Edited 03/16/2020 by KEM] (KM) |
| 05/04/2020 |
| It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, that oral argument is set for Friday, June 19, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. before the panel of Chief Judge Bartley and Judges Pietsch and Falvey. Counsel for the parties are allotted 30 minutes each for presentation of argument.
As of March 18, 2020, the Court began scheduling oral arguments via teleconference due to public health concerns associated with the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Because it is uncertain how long this pandemic will continue, logistics regarding whether oral argument will be held in person or via teleconference will be determined at a later time, with early notice given to the parties. (DB) |
| 06/15/2020 |
| Appearance of Sarah W Fusina for Robert L. Wilkie, in case 18-765 as co-counsel (SWF) |
| 06/16/2020 |
| Notice or other pleading by Appellee Notice of Clarification and Concession of Error (MDV) |
| 06/19/2020 |
| Case argued before Chief Judge Bartley and Judges Pietsch and Falvey. (DB) |
| 06/23/2020 |
| Supplemental authorities under Rule 30(b). (AD) |
| 01/27/2021 |
| Supplemental authorities under Rule 30(b). (AD) |
| 07/01/2021 |
| Opinion, by the Panel, that the BVA decn is set aside and remanded. The part of the January 26, 2018 Board decision denying TDIU is affirmed. (BARTLEY, PIETSCH and FALVEY) Chief Judge Bartley, concurring in part, dissenting in part.--[Edited 07/06/2021 by RW] (RW) |
| 07/26/2021 |
| Judgment (AF) |
|
