| 10/14/2020 |
| RECEIVED: Notice of John Niles to withdraw as counsel (Duplicate)--[Edited 10/14/2020 by PTD] (EMW) |
| 10/20/2020 |
| Case argued before Judges Pietsch, Greenberg, and Toth. (DB) |
| 06/01/2021 |
| Opinion that the Court AFFIRMS the April 17, 2019, Board decision. GREENBERG, Judge, dissenting: The line between a plain language analysis and
interpreting ambiguity in a statute has never been more blurred. What the majority calls historical
context to support a plain language finding could very easily be described as reviewing legislative
history to uncover the meaning of an ambiguous term. With the utmost respect for my esteemed
colleagues, I have no alternative but to dissent. (PIETSCH, GREENBERG and TOTH) (AMN) |
| 06/14/2021 |
| RECEIVED: Mot of appellant for reconsideration (AF) |
| 06/14/2021 |
| Returned materials (APS) |
| 06/14/2021 |
| Mot of Appellant (Luke D. Miller) to withdraw as counsel (LDM) |
| 06/16/2021 |
| Mot of Appellant in opposition to attorney's request to withdraw (AF) |
| 06/16/2021 |
| Second Mot of Appellant in opposition to attorney's request to withdraw (AF) |
| 06/17/2021 |
| ORDERED that the motion is granted. The appellant is treated as self-represented until a
qualified representative enters an appearance. The Court does not appoint counsel. (AF) |
| 06/17/2021 |
| Mot of Appellant for reconsideration (AF) |
