| 01/11/2023 |
| This case was submitted to a panel consisting of Judges Pietsch, Greenberg, and Jaquith for decision on November 4, 2022. Pursuant to Rule 34 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Clerk will schedule oral argument as the business of the Court permits. (DB) |
| 01/25/2023 |
| It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, that oral argument is set for Wednesday, April 19, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. before the panel of Judges Pietsch, Greenberg, and Jaquith. Whether oral argument will be held in person or remotely will be determined at a later time, with early notice given to the parties. Counsel for the parties are allotted 30 minutes each for presentation of argument.--[Edited 01/25/2023 by APS] (DB) |
| 03/06/2023 |
| Motion of Appellant - Joint motion For Clarification of Issues for Oral Argument (HES) |
| 04/03/2023 |
| Notice or other pleading by Appellee Solze Notice (DP) |
| 04/04/2023 |
| PER CURIAM ORDERED that the parties be prepared to discuss the issue set forth above. (PIETSCH, GREENBERG and JAQUITH) (NK) |
| 04/11/2023 |
| PER CURIAM, ORDERED that the appellant file a response to this order not later than 5 days after the date of this order. (PIETSCH, GREENBERG and JAQUITH) (GBG) |
| 04/17/2023 |
| Response by Appellant to Court's April 11, 2023 Order (HES) |
| 04/19/2023 |
| Case argued before Judges Pietsch, Greenberg, and Jaquith. (DB) |
| 03/19/2024 |
| Opinion that the February 22, 2021, Board decision denying entitlement to TDIU is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for further adjudication consistent with this decision. The balance of the appeal is DISMISSED. (PIETSCH, GREENBERG and JAQUITH) PIETSCH, Judge, filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.--[Edited 03/19/2024 by NK] (NK) |
| 04/10/2024 |
| Judgment (SM) |
|
