| 06/30/2023 |
| ENTRY REMOVED - WRONG CASE--[Edited 06/30/2023 by NK] (NK) |
| 09/20/2023 |
| It is ORDERED that this case is submitted to the panel of Chief Judge Bartley, Judge Greenberg, and Judge Jaquith for decision. (RG) |
| 09/27/2023 |
| This case was submitted to a panel consisting of Chief Judge Bartley and Judges Greenberg and Jaquith for decision on September 20, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 34 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Clerk will schedule oral argument as the business of the Court permits. (DB) |
| 10/20/2023 |
| It is ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, that oral argument, which will be held remotely, is set for Tuesday, December 12, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. before the panel of Chief Judge Bartley and Judges Greenberg and Jaquith. Counsel for the parties are allotted 30 minutes each for presentation of argument. (DB) |
| 10/20/2023 |
| Appearance of Michal Leah Kanovsky for Martin D. Spigner III, in case 22-2636 as co-counsel (MK) |
| 11/29/2023 |
| Supplemental authorities under Rule 30(b). (BSC) |
| 12/12/2023 |
| Case argued before Chief Judge Bartley and Judges Greenberg and Jaquith. (DB) |
| 12/12/2023 |
| It was ordered from the bench tht the Secretary should sumbit 2 pieces of information within 14 days: 1) Clarify whether Mr. Spigner had a tele-hearing that was completely offsite in October 2021 (so that he was not at the Columbia RO), or was it a video conference hearing where he was onsite. & 2) Did Mr. Spigner not appear at the August 2021 hearing or did VA cancel that hearing due to COVID or take some other measure to cancel that hearing. (DB) |
| 12/27/2023 |
| Response by Appellee to December 12, 2023, Order (BSC) |
| 07/17/2024 |
| Supplemental authorities under Rule 30(b). (JSP) |
