| 07/20/2023 |
| Response by Appellant (KHD) |
| 09/19/2023 |
| Case argued Chief Judge Bartley and Judges Pietsch and Laurer. (DB) |
| 10/27/2023 |
| Notice or other pleading by Appellant solze (KHD) |
| 11/02/2023 |
| PER CURIAM: ORDERED that within 21 days of this order, the parties respond to the Court’s order, address the Court’s jurisdiction, and provide any documents necessary to support their contentions. (BARTLEY, PIETSCH and LAURER) (JM) |
| 11/08/2023 |
| Joint motion for a 45-day ext of time to respond to the Court's 11/2/2023 order (NPK) |
| 11/13/2023 |
| For the Panel: Judge's stamp order granting the Joint motion for a 45-day extension of time to respond to the Court's 11/02/2023 order until 01/11/2024. (BARTLEY, PIETSCH and LAURER)--[Edited 11/13/2023 by JM] (JM) |
| 01/11/2024 |
| Response by Appellee to the Ct's 11/2/23 Order (NPK) |
| 01/11/2024 |
| Response by Appellant (KHD) |
| 07/08/2024 |
| The panel of judges established by this Court has determined that this appeal should proceed before a single judge. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the panel is dissolved, and the matter will proceed before Judge Laurer as a single judge. On behalf of the panel, this case is returned to Judge Laurer. (DB) |
| 07/08/2024 |
| Memorandum Decision that the Court DISMISSES the appeal of the Board’s May 3, 2021, order. (LAURER) (JM) |
